AMN403 Marketing and Survey Research
Assessment 3
Semester 2, 2017
Due date: Friday October 27th (Week 13). Online submission only by uploading to Blackboard by 11.59pm. In accordance with QUT policy, no late submissions will be marked.
Weighting: 55%
Individual or group: Individual
Word limit: 2500 (Maximum eg no +10%) including references.
Content of Part B is not included in the word count.
Note: Please don’t ask your tutor to read your draft writing to
“see if it is ok”.
Instructions:
There are two parts to this assessment. No executive summary, introduction or summary sections are required.
PART A
This assessment requires a research design to address the Extreme Exposure Rock Climbing case, which has been uploaded to Blackboard. Your research design should not be written as an academic essay, but in a business style as if you were a marketing research firm pitching for this contract. However, you must still reference the sources used to justify your assertions. Another researcher should be able to follow quite specific steps in your research plan to collect the required data to address the research question. Use 1.5 line spacing, and either ARIAL or TIMES NEW ROMAN 12 point font.
While it would be expected you provide a title page, no executive summary, introduction, background or table of contents are required. Your research design should be structured as follows:
1. In your own words, outline the management decision problem (MDP) statement/question, and provide a one paragraph rationale using only the information provided in the case. Outline the marketing research question (MRQ), and provide a brief rationale that references the literature. List two research objectives that address the MRQ.
2. Describe your proposed research methodology, utilising mixed methods (qualitative and quantitative), to address the research objectives. Be clear about how each objective is being addressed by each method. Describe your
2
proposed sampling and data collection procedures. Indicate the data analysis techniques, for both your qualitative and quantitative stages.
3. Provide a one-page sample of a data collection instrument, such as a focus group moderator’s guide or your questionnaire items. You do not need to prepare an entire questionnaire. The questions recommended should clearly address a research objective.
4. Briefly acknowledge any limitations of your research design.
To reiterate, another researcher should be able to easily follow the specific steps in your research design to obtain the necessary information to address the MDP/MRQ.
PART B
This section of your report is not related to the case study information in Part A. Rather, it has been included to enable you to demonstrate your ability as a marketing researcher to undertake data analysis. From the SPSS data file AMN403 Assessment 3 data set, which has been uploaded to Blackboard, undertake and report the following data analyses:
Independent-samples t-test to determine any significant statistical differences between international students and domestic students for Question 5 scale items: 1 to 20. List the item names, the two means and the sig. for each of these.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine any significant statistical differences by YEAR STARTED DEGREE for Question 5 scale items: 1 to 20. List the scale item names and the sig. for each of the group differences.
Bivariate correlation matrix to identify any STRONG and significant associations between scale item 20 and scale items 1 to 19 in Question 5. List the scale item name, the sig. and the correlation coefficient for each of these.
Please note Question 5 starts with: “Using these numbers as a guide, please circle one number for every one of the following statements….”. This question then contains 20 scale items.
Please do not attach the entire SPSS data analysis output, as we only want you to report the information as instructed above. No introduction is required. Also, you do not need to discuss the reasons for using each technique and you do not need to make any recommendation about the results. This is a fictitious file, based on the questionnaire uploaded to Blackboard as ‘AMN403 Assessment 3 – Part B data set questionnaire.pdf’.
3
References
While this assessment is to be written in a business report style rather than a theoretical academic essay, you must acknowledge any sources of information used. For example, references to academic papers should be used to support assertions about the merits of a particular survey method or data analysis procedure.
Academic Honesty
QUT expects students to act honestly in assessments. The issue of plagiarism is taken seriously and students are reminded to ensure that assessments submitted represent their own work.
Late submission policy
It is QUT policy that assessments submitted after the due date will not be marked, and therefore receive a mark of zero.
Marking criteria
The attached marking criteria will be used for this assessment. Each of the eight criteria are weighted equally. The maximum mark for each criteria is 12.5/100.
Marketing research proposal of Extreme Exposure
1.0 The management decision problem of Extreme Exposure
The management decision problem that Extreme Exposure Rock Climbing faces is that of competition from Kyle. The major statement of this research is to identify the kind of products that Extreme Exposure should provide in order to ward off competition from Kyle. Therefore, the market research question of this study is: What products and services should Extreme Exposure provide to customers to increase demand and keep off competition from Kyle. The rationale of this study is based on the fact that Extreme exposure faces competition from Kyle which is offering additional services to its customers such as certification programs. Kyle annual membership program also offer lower fees than the one offered by Extreme Exposure. Kyle is also providing outdoor experiences which Extreme exposure does not have. In addition, it provides a 60 feet rock climbing experience while Extreme exposure provides 50 feet rock climbing experience. Therefore research is needed to help Extreme Exposure know which features, products and experiences that they will they incorporate in order to remain competitive. Therefore the two research objectives of this study are:
- What programs makes Extreme Exposure customers come to the company because they are unique?
- What new programs and experiences do customers want?
2.0 Research methodology
There are three types of research methodologies that can be used in marketing research investigation. They include quantitative research method, quantitative research method and mixed methods. The qualitative research methods assess non quantifiable phenomena such as emotions, opinions and attitudes. The quantitative research assesses verifiable phenomena using numbers and facts (Koul, 2009). Mixed research methods combine the two methods which are quantitative and qualitative. This study will use mixed methods to investigate the research questions. Quantitative research method will mostly assist in identifying facts regarding the products offered by the competitors. This research also establish which product is more competitive than the other hence the need to use numbers and quantity to determine whether Extreme Exposure products were superior or better than the ones that are to be offered by Kyle. In addition, the methods will be effective in identifying whether the customers will be receptive to the new products offered by the competition or will prefer to continue enjoying services provided by Extreme Exposure. However, the research will also use qualitative methods to identify the reasons why the customers would prefer to use a different product. This is because according to Morgan and Smircich (2010) qualitative research methods allow the researcher to obtain explanations and reasons behind the participants’ responses and reactions.
Sampling
There are several sampling strategies that can be used in an investigation which are random sampling and the stratified sampling. According to Koul (2009), random sampling entails selection of the research participants in non predictable manner or haphazardly. The stratified sampling entails selection of participants by identifying participants based on particular characteristics. This research will use stratified sampling because this research focuses on collecting data from participants. The stratified sampling selects participants with defined characteristics. In this study, the researcher selected participants who were customers of Extreme Experience. The participants had to have been involved in rock climbing experience so that they can effectively share their explanations or what they would want from a rock climbing experience.
Data collection
The data was collected by issuing out questionnaires to the participants. The questions had to be close ended for quantitative research and open ended for qualitative research (Pickard, 2007). The researcher had to wait for customers of Extreme Experience at the venue to request them to participate in the research. Once the participants accepted to participate, the researcher asked the participant to sign consent form and to answer the research questions as honestly as possible. The research instrument was self administered by the researcher in this study.
3. A one-page sample of a data collection instrument
Answer the following questions by ticking the most appropriate response
Part A: Quantitative questions
Table 1: A sample of data collection instruments
| Items | 1=Strongly disagree | 2= Disagree | 3= Neutral | 4= Agree | Strongly agree |
| You would want Extreme Exposure to have outdoor events | |||||
| You would want Extreme exposure to have 60feet rocks | |||||
| You would be interested in a rock climbing certification | |||||
| You would pay more to have an outdoor rock climbing experience | |||||
| You are satisfied with Extreme Exposure Rock climbing |
Part B: Qualitative question
What would you like to be improved in Extreme Exposure rock climbing experiences?
4. Limitations of your research design
The major challenge is that mixed research methods take a lot time and resources. Koul (2009) noted that analysing content from many participants is usually difficult which comprises the quality of results obtained through mixed research methods. To overcome this challenge this research narrowed down questions that would be answered by qualitative methods to one question.
Part B
Independent sample t-test results
From the study, it was evident that there were some elements which had significant differences between the local students and the international students. For instance, on the first item in the questionnaire of unit materials and whether they enabled the students to learn. The study noted that there was significant difference between local and international student’s perception of the unit materials and the influence they had on their understanding of the unit. This is because p-value was 0.003 which was lesser than 0.05. It is important to note that p-value which was lesser than 0.05 indicated that there statistical difference was significant while p-value that was higher than 0.05 indicated that there was no significant difference between the variables.
On whether there was significant difference between the international students and local students concerning whether the unit materials would help them acquire the necessary knowledge and skills. The study identified that the p-value was 0.002 which was lesser than 0.05 indicating that the difference was statistically significant.
On whether there was significant difference between the international and local students in regard to the effect of how learning methods affected their learning, the p-value was 0.021 which was lesser than 0.05 thus indicating that the statistical difference was significant.
On whether there was statistical difference between the international students and local students’ perception of the topic and what students wanted to learn. The study identified that the p value was 0.058 which was slightly higher than 0.05. This indicated that there was no significant difference between the two items.
On if there was statistical difference between the international students and local students need for assessments that were related to the task, the study identified that p value was 0.214 which was higher than 0.05. This indicated that there was no statistical difference between the international students and local students concerning their perceptions on assessments.
On whether there were significant differences in expectations of the international students and local students concerning the guidance criteria, the study found that the p value was 0.030 which was lower than 0.05 thus indicating that there was statistical difference between the two items.
Concerning whether there was any statistical difference between the international and local students understanding of the requirements of the assessment program, the research found that p value was 0.900 which was higher than 0.05. This implied that there was no statistical difference between international students and local students understanding of requirement of the assessment program.
On if there were differences between how the international and local students perceived resources given to them as helpful to their learning, the p value was 0.133 which was higher than 0.05 indicating that there was no significant difference between the perceptions of the two groups of students.
On whether there were differences between the two groups on how they perceived the feedback they provided and whether it would be used to improve the unit, the p-value was 0.002 which was less than 0.05 indicating there the difference was significant.
Concerning whether there was a significant difference between how the two groups perceived the importance of the unit, the p-value was 0.404 which was above 0.05.this meant that there were no statistical differences between the international and local students perception of the importance of the unit.
On if there was significant differences between how the two groups perceived the assistance of the teaching staff in helping them understand the expectations of the unit, the o value was 0.954 which was above 0.05. This implied that the differences were not statistically significant.
On whether there were differences in how international and local students perceived the teaching staff ability to create a learning atmosphere, the p value was 0.338 which was less than 0.05. This meant that the there was no difference between the two groups perception of the teaching staff’s capability to create a learning atmosphere.
On if there were significant differences between the groups’ perception of the teaching staff’s capacity to be friendly and helpful to the students, the p value was 0.871 which was above 0.05 and it implied that the differences between the international and local students perception of teaching staff’s capacity to be friendly were not statistically significant.
Concerning whether there were differences between the international student and local students perception of the teaching staff genuine interests in their learning, the study identified that the p value was 0.530 and it was above 0.05 indicating that there were no significant differences between the two groups.
On if there were statistical differences between international and local students perception regarding whether the teaching staff provided helpful feedback, the p-value was 0.881 which was above 0.05 indicating that the differences between the two groups was not statistically significant.
On whether the there were differences in how the international students and local students perceived the teaching staff ability to develop knowledge and understanding of the skills the p value was 0.512 which was above 0.05. This meant that the difference between the two groups of students in their perception of tutors capabilities to develop their skills and knowledge was not statistically significant.
On whether there were differences in how the two groups perceived the teacher use of aids and a resource in improving their learning, the p value was 0.01 which was lower than 0.05 indicating that the difference between the two groups of students was significant in regard to how they perceived teaching aids.
On whether there were differences how the international students and local students perceived the assessments ability to help them learn, the study identified that the p-value was 0.064 which was above 0.05 implying that the differences between the two groups of students was not statistically significant.
On whether there were differences between how the international students and local students perceived the units’ importance to them in future, the p value was 0.64 which was above 0.05 thus indicating that the difference in perception of the importance of the unit to the students was not significant.
Figure 1: Independent Sample T test
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
On whether there are any statistical differences between the unit material and the year degree started the findings identified that the p value was 0.00 which was lower than 0.05 which is the level of statistical significance. This implied that there was a significant difference between the year that the degree started and how the students perceived the unit materials used in the unit.
On whether there were the significant differences between the year started degree and the students’ perception of their role of unit materials in acquisition of knowledge and skills. The p-value was 0.00 which was lower than 0.005 and it demonstrated that there was significant difference between the two items.
In regard to whether there was significant difference between year degrees started and if the students considered the teaching methods help to them, the study identified that the p value was 0.00 which was less than 0.05 indicating that there was significant difference between the year started and the perception that the students had regarding the teaching methods and their role in helping the students to learn.
On whether there were significant differences between the year degree started and the students’ perception of topic and content of the unit. The study identified that the p value was 0.000 which implied that the difference between the two items was significant.
Similarly the items regarding assessment of tasks and the guidelines criteria all had a p value of 0.00 which implied that there was a significant difference between the year started and the students’ perception of the assessment and assessment criteria guidelines.
However, concerning whether there was a significant difference between year degree started and the students’ ability to understand the requirements of the program, the p value was 0.470 which was above 0.05 and this implied that there difference between the two groups was not significant.
On whether there was a statistical difference between the year degree stated and the students’ perception of the role of unit resources to help them learn, the p value was 0.394 which was above 0.05. This implied that there was no significant difference between the year degree started and the student’s perception of the unit resources in helping them to learn.
On the significant differences between the year degree started and the feedback from the students, the study identified that the p value was 0.387 which was above 0.05. This implied that there were no significant differences between the year degree started and the perception that the students had towards the feedback provided by the tutors.
Figure 2: ANOVA analysis
Bivariate correlation matrix to identify any STRONG and significant associations
There were several strong correlations between the research items. The correlation was deemed to be strong if it was above 0.5 while it was weak if it was below 0.5.
Based on this, the correlation between unit materials and all the other items was strong because it was 1. This indicated that there was string correlations between the unit materials and assessments gives as well as the students overall ranking of the unit.
There was also a strong correlation between unit, materials provided and how the students perceived the role of unit materials in knowledge acquisition as the correlation was value was 0.851 which was above 0.5 and depicted strong positive relationship between the two items.
On the items which had the weakest association based on the Bivariate correlation matrix, there was negative correlations between the topic’s contents and the teaching staff capability to make the students understand what they were expected to learn in the unit.
References
Koul, L. (2009) Methodology of educational research. Noida: Vikas Publishing House.
Morgan, G. and Smircich, L. (2010) ‘The Case of Qualitative Research,’ Academy of Management Review, 5(1), pp. 491-500.
Pickard, A. J. (2007) Research Methods in Information. London: Facet Publishing.
Bitcoin fraudsters
They include companies such as Bit4me (www.bit4me.com), others inlclude http://www.hyperexchanGo.com which is another existing scam. Please take caution and do not use the website at all for any bitcoin transactions.
About Bit4me
The following are the details of bit4me obtained from http://www.cutestat.com. They show that the domain is new and that it is registered by namecheap.com. Please note that Bit4me is a scam bitcoin company and endeavor to keep away from this fraudsters.
Domain Name: BIT4ME.COM
Registry Domain ID: 2024144931_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.enom.com
Registrar URL: http://www.enom.com
Updated Date: 2016-04-25T17:42:17.00Z
Creation Date: 2016-04-26T00:42:00.00Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2017-04-26T00:42:00.00Z
Registrar: ENOM, INC.
Registrar IANA ID: 48
Reseller: NAMECHEAP.COM
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://www.icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID:
Registrant Name: WHOISGUARD PROTECTED
Registrant Organization: WHOISGUARD, INC.
Registrant Street: P.O. BOX 0823-03411
Registrant City: PANAMA
Registrant State/Province: PANAMA
Registrant Postal Code: 00000
Registrant Country: PA
Registrant Phone: +507.8365503
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax: +51.17057182
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email: 8C49B78087174178B3E42CD3693D8FE5.PROTECT@WHOISGUARD.COM
Registry Admin ID:
Admin Name: WHOISGUARD PROTECTED
Admin Organization: WHOISGUARD, INC.
Admin Street: P.O. BOX 0823-03411
Admin City: PANAMA
Admin State/Province: PANAMA
Admin Postal Code: 00000
Admin Country: PA
Admin Phone: +507.8365503
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax: +51.17057182
Admin Fax Ext:
Admin Email: 8C49B78087174178B3E42CD3693D8FE5.PROTECT@WHOISGUARD.COM
Registry Tech ID:
Tech Name: WHOISGUARD PROTECTED
Tech Organization: WHOISGUARD, INC.
Tech Street: P.O. BOX 0823-03411
Tech City: PANAMA
Tech State/Province: PANAMA
Tech Postal Code: 00000
Tech Country: PA
Tech Phone: +507.8365503
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech Fax: +51.17057182
Tech Fax Ext:
Tech Email: 8C49B78087174178B3E42CD3693D8FE5.PROTECT@WHOISGUARD.COM
Name Server: DNS1.REGISTRAR-SERVERS.COM
Name Server: DNS2.REGISTRAR-SERVERS.COM
Name Server: DNS3.REGISTRAR-SERVERS.COM
Name Server: DNS4.REGISTRAR-SERVERS.COM
Name Server: DNS5.REGISTRAR-SERVERS.COM
DNSSEC: unSigned
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@enom.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4252982646
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/
Last update of WHOIS database: 2016-04-25T17:42:17.00Z
Bit4me is a scam bitcoin seller and buyer
Bitmow and bitmim have transformed themselves into another scam company called bit4me. The new website is www.bit4me.com. I write this to inform potential freelance writers about bitcoin scam companies so that they can keep away from bitcoin scammers who thrive by operating phishing websites and exchanges that steal away bitcoins and funds sent to them. These scammers have been operating since time immemorial and they take advantage of the non reversibility of the bitcoin transactions. Therefore it is important to note that bit4me is a con website and it is one of the websites that scam people their bitcoins. Please do not use bit4me for any bitcoin or financial transaction. Keep off bit4me because it is a scam and fraud company. Once you send bitcoin to bit4me you will never get back. So always keep in mind that most of the company that pretend that they can sell Paypal money for bitcoin are scams. Bit4me will only be active for the month of September before they rename themselves into another company. Previously bit4me operated as bitmim or www.bitmim.com. In July bitmim or www.bitmim.com operated as www.bitmow.com. Before they were bitmow they operated as www.bit2co.com. All of the above named sites are no longer operational but they were being operated by the same conmen.
Bit4me is a bitcoin scam
There is no shortage of bitcoin scammers. These are people who eke a living out scamming people their money and their bitcoins. We endeavour to keep track of the latest scammers by sharing information about the scammers as quickly as we can. This ensures that fewer popel are scammed by these scammers. The latest scammer on the block is bit4me. Once you semd your bitcoin to bit4me that is the last you will get your bitcoin. Please be aware that bit4me is scam. Also do not send them your e-money from Paypal, Okpay, Adv-Cash or Payeer because you will not get the bitcoin and you will never get back your money. Please avoid using bit4me. Its sister companies include bitmow which is another major scam company and the other Hyper ExchanGo which is a scam. Once you send them money they never gave the money back. Soon I will be presenting the identity of the person who runs this scam websites. The scammer is from United States although the websites is based on Poland and protected by Who Is Guard. We have already submitted complaints to international police and the scammer’s days are numbered. Keep your money safe by staying away from these scammers.
Bitmow is a Scam Beware!
Guys I want to bring to your attention a website bitmow.com that is stealing bitcoins. This website is on a thieving spree of your precious bitcoins. The site is purporting to exchange your bitcoin for US dollars that they are claiming they will pay for in money through Paypal, Skrill, Webmoney, Payeer, AdvCash and moneygram.
The catch is, once you initiate the exchange the site is prompting you to share your key with them. In case you do so they will send you an email claiming they have sent you the money but you will not receive any money from them. They also don’t have an escrow system to enable you to get back your bitcoin in case they don’t pay. Of course that is a deliberate omission as they want to steal the bitcoins!
The saddest and most alarming part of the website is that their domain is constantly changing. The website has been changing within weeks. Sometime back they were operating as bit2co.com, they evolved to bitmim.com and now they are operating as bitmow.com. The only thing that these cyber criminals are not changing is the layout of their website that I will share in the screenshot above.
Hyper Exchango bitcoin exchange is a scam
We always endeavour to update our followers and readers of websites which are scam. Our focus specifically is on those websites which scam people bitcoins. These are websites which do not have history and have very low trust scores. These websites are usually not older than one month or two months. These phishing sites pretend that they can exchange your bitcoin with e-currencies such as Paypal, Skrill, Payoneer, Okpay, Perfect Money and Adv Cash. Unsuspecting customers especially those who are new to bitcoin usually do not verify the genuinity of such websites and they usually send their bitcoin to the scammers waiting for the e currency. The scammers pretend that they can process the transactions quickly without the need for verification which is requirement for many genuine websites. This makes the customers who need to obtain cash quickly to throw caution to the wind and quickly send their money to the scammers. The scammers never respond to your queries once they receive your bitcoin or your money. They also block your IP address so that your computer fails to access the website again. They are classic case of use and dump.
The recent scammer in the block is none other than Hyper Exchango. The scammer promotes his website on Facebook. The scammer does not allow people to make comments on the website because he is aware that scammed customers would make negative comments on the page thus making it impossible to lure unsuspecting customers. If you are buying bitcoin for the first time the best place to buy bitcoins is from trusted sellers on local bitcoins or from genuine exchanges such as Bittrex, HitBtc, Poloniex, Changelly, Kraken or Livecoin. Even though they may be expensive it is difficult for them to scam you because they have a reputation to keep. This is unlike scammers who will exit from their website within a month.
I am writing this to warn first time buyers of bitcoin not to use Hyper ExchanGo – Bitcoin Exchange because the website is fraudulent and it is a bitcoin phishing website. Do not lose your money by sending them money or bitcoin to them. Another bitcoin scammer who is still operating is the bitmow.com. BitMow is another scam website. You can only use them if you want to lose your bitcoin. They are still scamming people especially unsuspecting bitcoin buyers. Please keep away from BitMow and you will keep your money. You can read about it here: https://wordpress.com/read/feeds/22940429/posts/1562628358
Keep visiting my blog because I will keep you informed on bitcoin scammers who come in different faces every day. As I have informed you the latest active scammers are Hyper Exchango and BitMow. You will not receive your money or bitcoin when you send anything to them.
Please keep off www.bitmow.com
One of the ways of making bitmow to go under is by filling out fake orders on their websites and then cancelling the order. This keeps their systems busy while they are not processing any orders. You can also report http://www.bitmow.com to reputation websites such as http://www.trustpilot.com among others. In addition you can make twitter posting indicating that http://www.bitmow.com is scam. The tweets act as a history that makes the reputation of website negative forever. Please do not forget that http://www.bitmow.com is scam. Please do not forget that http://www.bitmow.com is scam. Please do not forget that http://www.bitmow.com is scam. Please do not forget that http://www.bitmow.com is scam. Please do not forget that http://www.bitmow.com is scam. Please do not forget that http://www.bitmow.com is scam. Please do not forget that http://www.bitmow.com is scam. Please do not forget that http://www.bitmow.com is scam. Please do not forget that http://www.bitmow.com is scam. Please do not forget that http://www.bitmow.com is scam. Please do not forget that http://www.bitmow.com is scam. Please do not forget that http://www.bitmow.com is scam. Please do not forget that http://www.bitmow.com is scam. Please do not forget that http://www.bitmow.com is scam. Please do not forget that http://www.bitmow.com is scam. Please do not forget that http://www.bitmow.com is scam. Please do not forget that http://www.bitmow.com is scam. Please do not forget that http://www.bitmow.com is scam. Please do not forget that http://www.bitmow.com is scam. Please do not forget that http://www.bitmow.com is scam. Please do not forget that http://www.bitmow.com is scam. Please do not forget that http://www.bitmow.com is scam. Please do not forget that http://www.bitmow.com is scam. Please do not forget that http://www.bitmow.com is scam.
Bitmow is a scam www.bitmow.com is a scam
Bitmow is a scam. It is a new website which bitcoin newbies are now aware of. It is a scam website which is a sister to other scam websites such as http://www.bit2co.com and http://www.bitmim.com. I always test these websites that pretend to buy bitcoins at higher prices than other exchanges. Most of the scammers pretend that they pay through paypal or skrill although they never do. You are not protected when selling your bitcoin to http://www.bitmow.com because bitcoin transactions are irreversible. You are not under seller-buyer protection policy and there is nothing you can do in case they do not send you the money. For those who want to use http://www.bitmow.com please keep off. I have taken the trouble of writing this although I have other things to do because it would hurt me if you lost your bitcoin to http://www.bitmow.com scammers. Although bitcoin is profitable, it is filled with scammers such as http://www.bitmow.com who are untraceable and anonymous hence once they get your bitcoin, your case is closed and your money is lost. To save your money please keep away from http://www.bitmow.com. Just like their sister companies http://www.bitmim.com and http://www.bit2co.com vanished after stealing enough bitcoins even http://www.bitmow.com will soon vanish. Please know that http://www.bitmow.com is a scam. Please beware that http://www.bitmow is a scam. Do not let their fake dashboard showing that people are selling 1btc make you sell your bitcoin to them. It is better to sell your bitcoin elsewhere at a loss than to lose all your bitcoin through http://www.bitmow.com. These are fraudsters. http://www.bitmow.com is fraud. http://www.bitmow.com is fraud. http://www.bitmow.com is fraud. http://www.bitmow.com is fraud. http://www.bitmow.com is fraud. http://www.bitmow.com is fraud. http://www.bitmow.com is fraud. http://www.bitmow.com is fraud. http://www.bitmow.com is fraud. http://www.bitmow.com is fraud. Learn that http://www.bitmow.com is a scam. Learn that http://www.bitmow.com is a scam. Learn that http://www.bitmow.com is a scam. Learn that http://www.bitmow.com is a scam. Learn that http://www.bitmow.com is a scam. Learn that http://www.bitmow.com is a scam. Learn that http://www.bitmow.com is a scam. Learn that http://www.bitmow.com is a scam. Learn that http://www.bitmow.com is a scam. Learn that http://www.bitmow.com is a scam. Learn that http://www.bitmow.com is a scam. Learn that http://www.bitmow.com is a scam. Learn that http://www.bitmow.com is a scam. Learn that http://www.bitmow.com is a scam. Learn that http://www.bitmow.com is a scam. Learn that http://www.bitmow.com is a scam.
Keep off http://www.bitmow.com they are bitcoin scammers. Let us clear bitcoin ecosystem by announcing scammers. Keep off http://www.bitmow.com they are bitcoin scammers. Keep off http://www.bitmow.com they are bitcoin scammers. Keep off http://www.bitmow.com they are bitcoin scammers. Keep off http://www.bitmow.com they are bitcoin scammers. Keep off http://www.bitmow.com they are bitcoin scammers. Keep off http://www.bitmow.com they are bitcoin scammers. Keep off http://www.bitmow.com they are bitcoin scammers. Keep off http://www.bitmow.com they are bitcoin scammers. Keep off http://www.bitmow.com they are bitcoin scammers. Keep off http://www.bitmow.com they are bitcoin scammers. Keep off http://www.bitmow.com they are bitcoin scammers. Keep off http://www.bitmow.com they are bitcoin scammers. Keep off http://www.bitmow.com they are bitcoin scammers. Keep off http://www.bitmow.com they are bitcoin scammers. Keep off http://www.bitmow.com they are bitcoin scammers. Keep off http://www.bitmow.com they are bitcoin scammers. Keep off http://www.bitmow.com they are bitcoin scammers. Keep off http://www.bitmow.com they are bitcoin scammers. Keep off http://www.bitmow.com they are bitcoin scammers. Keep off http://www.bitmow.com they are bitcoin scammers. Keep off http://www.bitmow.com they are bitcoin scammers. Keep off http://www.bitmow.com they are bitcoin scammers. Keep off http://www.bitmow.com they are bitcoin scammers. Keep off http://www.bitmow.com they are bitcoin scammers. Keep off http://www.bitmow.com they are bitcoin scammers. Keep off http://www.bitmow.com they are bitcoin scammers. Keep off http://www.bitmow.com they are bitcoin scammers.
writingscamreport 